Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-30 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-30 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WG-30 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 66 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outside dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the WG-30.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-30 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-30.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-30 will offer extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $428 |