Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-30W (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 6 years before the WG-30W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the WG-30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-30W
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WG-30W | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | April 2009 | Fresher by 66 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-30W
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WG-30W.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-30W is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-30W.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-30W will provide more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $280 |