Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-4 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 5 years prior to the WG-4 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WG-4 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 58 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the WG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $330 |