Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 6 years prior to the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the WG-5 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WG-5 GPS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | April 2009 | Newer by 70 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-5 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-5 GPS.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $500 |