Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was released 6 years prior to the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades vs the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 65 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR features outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $2,000 |