Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
96 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and DV300F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 3 years prior to the DV300F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the DV300F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | DV300F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| DV300F | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers outside dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the DV300F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and DV300F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and DV300F.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung DV300F will deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $200 |