Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Released April 2009
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and ST65 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 20 months earlier than the ST65 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm F200EXR ST65 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 ST65 Fujifilm F200EXR 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011April 2009More modern by 20 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm F200EXR ST65 
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the ST65.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST65.

As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung ST65 will offer you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography information
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography information
21
manual focus not available
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW format
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Street photography camera
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW format
49
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Sports photography details
Samsung ST65 Sports photography details
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of phase detect autofocus
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
71
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography info
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography info
38
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
37
fast max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging information
Samsung ST65 Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
27
fast max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST65
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRSamsung ST65
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Samsung ST65
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2009-04-30 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/3.3-5.1 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lbs) -
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC -
Card slots One One
Cost at release $350 $130