Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and ST95 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 20 months prior to the ST95 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm F200EXR | ST95 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| ST95 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | April 2009 | More recent by 20 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm F200EXR | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the ST95.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST95.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST95 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $350 | $145 |