Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Introduced April 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and ST95 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 20 months prior to the ST95 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores versus the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung ST95

 Fujifilm F200EXR ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 ST95 Fujifilm F200EXR 
LaunchedJanuary 2011April 2009More recent by 20 months
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST95

 Fujifilm F200EXR ST95 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the ST95.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and ST95.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST95 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
21
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW files
29
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography features
Samsung ST95 Street photography features
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW files
50
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
good megapixels (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
57
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
71
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
38
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
37
very good maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic jack
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST95
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRSamsung ST95
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Samsung ST95
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-04-30 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Max aperture f/3.3-5.1 -
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash modes Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) -
Physical dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC -
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $350 $145