Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30


93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below is a complete review of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung WB150F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WB150F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 3 years before the WB150F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the WB150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung WB150F
Fujifilm F200EXR | WB150F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Fujifilm F200EXR
WB150F | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB150F
Fujifilm F200EXR | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the WB150F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB150F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB150F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB150F will render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB150F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $230 |