Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WB250F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm F200EXR was released 4 years earlier than the WB250F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung WB250F

 Fujifilm F200EXR WB250F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 WB250F Fujifilm F200EXR 
LaunchedJanuary 2013April 2009More modern by 44 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB250F

 Fujifilm F200EXR WB250F 
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got external measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the WB250F.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB250F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB250F will give more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
no RAW files
36
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography info
Samsung WB250F Street photography info
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB250F Sports photography highlights
28
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
no phase detect AF
52
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography details
Samsung WB250F Travel photography details
57
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography information
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography information
38
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.6")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging factors
Samsung WB250F Vlogging factors
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB250F
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRSamsung WB250F
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Samsung WB250F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-04-30 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.30 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 226g (0.50 lbs)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $350 $250