Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WB35F (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 5 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WB35F | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB35F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB35F will show greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-04-30 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $350 | $130 |
