Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WB50F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was launched 5 years prior to the WB50F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up vs the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WB50F | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB50F.
Plainly, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB50F will render greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $180 |
