Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40


85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm F500 EXR versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F500 EXR (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F500 EXR (1/2") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm F500 EXR was brought out 23 months before the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F500 EXR matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F500 EXR Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F500 EXR over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm F500 EXR | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm F500 EXR
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm F500 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm F500 EXR | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F500 EXR provides outer measurements of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F500 EXR versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F500 EXR and the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F500 EXR and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F500 EXR due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Fujifilm F500 EXR will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F500 EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $430 | $450 |