Clicky

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
42
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Fujifilm F500 EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F500 EXR (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F500 EXR (1/2") and SL202 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F500 EXR was released 23 months after the SL202 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm F500 EXR matches up vs the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F500 EXR over the Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm F500 EXR SL202 
ReleasedJanuary 2011February 2009Newer by 23 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm F500 EXR

 SL202 Fujifilm F500 EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm F500 EXR SL202 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F500 EXR offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F500 EXR versus the SL202.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F500 EXR and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and SL202.

Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F500 EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm F500 EXR will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F500 EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR Portrait photography details
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography details
31
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW format
25
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F500 EXR
Street photography with Samsung SL202
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (215g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW format
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
48
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR Travel photography advice
Samsung SL202 Travel photography advice
69
lighter than competition (215 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
57
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR Landscape photography info
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography info
44
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
27
really wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F500 EXR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
33
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (215g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
27
really wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F500 EXR and Samsung SL202
 Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXRSamsung SL202
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR Samsung SL202
Other name - PL50
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-05 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-360mm (15.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 215 gr (0.47 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $430 $140