Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Fujifilm F600 EXR and Ricoh CX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F600 EXR (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the Fujifilm F600 EXR (1/2") and CX1 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm F600 EXR was revealed 2 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm F600 EXR matches up vs the CX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F600 EXR over the Ricoh CX1
| Fujifilm F600 EXR | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Fujifilm F600 EXR
| CX1 | Fujifilm F600 EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F600 EXR and Ricoh CX1
| Fujifilm F600 EXR | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm F600 EXR features outside measurements of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F600 EXR and Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F600 EXR versus the CX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F600 EXR and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F600 EXR and CX1.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F600 EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm F600 EXR will deliver more detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F600 EXR should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-08-11 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (FHD 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (HD 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), High Speed Movie (80 / 160 / 320 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | AVI MPEG4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lb) | 180g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 40 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $299 |