Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
![Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR/Fujifilm-F600-EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL820 front Samsung SL820 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL820/Samsung-SL820-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is IT100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm F600 EXR versus Samsung SL820, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F600 EXR (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F600 EXR (1/2") and SL820 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F600 EXR was manufactured 2 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm F600 EXR grades against the SL820 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR and Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F600 EXR over the Samsung SL820
Fujifilm F600 EXR | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Fujifilm F600 EXR
SL820 | Fujifilm F600 EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F600 EXR and Samsung SL820
Fujifilm F600 EXR | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F600 EXR provides outer dimensions of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F600 EXR versus Samsung SL820 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F600 EXR compared to the SL820.
![Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 size comparison Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-vs-Samsung-SL820-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F600 EXR and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-vs-Samsung-SL820-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F600 EXR and SL820.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F600 EXR featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm F600 EXR will give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F600 EXR provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-vs-Samsung-SL820-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-vs-Samsung-SL820-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F600 EXR vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | Samsung SL820 |
Also called | - | IT100 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-08-11 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (FHD 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (HD 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), High Speed Movie (80 / 160 / 320 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVI MPEG4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 40 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $230 | $280 |