Clicky

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Fujifilm F750EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm F750EXR versus Olympus 9000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") and 9000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F750EXR was unveiled 2 years after the 9000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm F750EXR grades vs the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Olympus 9000

 Fujifilm F750EXR 9000 
ReleasedJanuary 2012May 2009More modern by 33 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm F750EXR

 9000 Fujifilm F750EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus 9000

 Fujifilm F750EXR 9000 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F750EXR offers exterior dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm F750EXR versus Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F750EXR versus the 9000.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F750EXR and 9000 is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F750EXR and 9000.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F750EXR with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F750EXR will show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F750EXR is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
36
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2")
lack of RAW files
20
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Street photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Street photography highlights
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (234g)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2")
lack of RAW files
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
52
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
small sensor (1/2")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F750EXR
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
68
lighter than others (234 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
58
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Landscape photography info
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography info
44
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Vlogging info
Olympus 9000 Vlogging info
34
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (234g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing microphone support
27
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (225g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus 9000
 Fujifilm FinePix F750EXROlympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR Olympus Stylus 9000
Also Known as - mju 9000
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-05 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 234g (0.52 lbs) 225g (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $445 $300