Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a09/10a0992a47b8db64226cfb5ebab18398483afc19" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea07/2ea07098bc2c75653ea4f487393acb90db672c4a" alt="Nikon Coolpix S8000 front Nikon Coolpix S8000 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Newer Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 183g - 103 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Nikon S8000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F770EXR (16MP) and the S8000 (14MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm F770EXR (1/2") and S8000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Fujifilm F770EXR was manufactured 19 months after the S8000 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F770EXR scores against the S8000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR & Nikon Coolpix S8000. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery & Nikon S8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F770EXR over the Nikon S8000
Fujifilm F770EXR | S8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8000 over the Fujifilm F770EXR
S8000 | Fujifilm F770EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F770EXR and Nikon S8000
Fujifilm F770EXR | S8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F770EXR provides outer measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Nikon S8000 has dimensions of 103mm x 57mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Nikon S8000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F770EXR and the S8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa86b/fa86badb5f5ca5f1d659316d2bf4d0d1a81d5aad" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F770EXR and S8000 is 90 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fc24/7fc24a2ff8d1adbdd806e4e2e56e5d5fd075212f" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F770EXR and S8000.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F770EXR due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F770EXR will render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F770EXR is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d699a/d699aeded29b4ea6a193b3b3ecc86fb62907c124" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18034/18034c3f2298353657c8e4953a62cae33a1ebfcd" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S8000 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Nikon Coolpix S8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Nikon Coolpix S8000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 30-300mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 234 grams (0.52 pounds) | 183 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 103 x 57 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $480 | $300 |