Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
![Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F770EXR/Fujifilm-F770EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL202/Samsung-SL202-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Refreshed by Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F770EXR (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F770EXR (1/2") and SL202 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F770EXR was announced 2 years after the SL202 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm F770EXR matches up vs the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F770EXR over the Samsung SL202
Fujifilm F770EXR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm F770EXR
SL202 | Fujifilm F770EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F770EXR and Samsung SL202
Fujifilm F770EXR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F770EXR has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F770EXR and the SL202.
![Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F770EXR-vs-Samsung-SL202-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F770EXR and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F770EXR-vs-Samsung-SL202-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The picture here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F770EXR and SL202.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F770EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F770EXR will offer you greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F770EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F770EXR-vs-Samsung-SL202-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F770EXR-vs-Samsung-SL202-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 234 grams (0.52 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $480 | $140 |