Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced January 2012
- Renewed by Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced December 2010
Photography Glossary Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Samsung WB700, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F770EXR (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F770EXR (1/2") and WB700 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F770EXR was unveiled 13 months after the WB700 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm F770EXR scores versus the WB700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR and Samsung WB700. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F770EXR over the Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm F770EXR | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | December 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Fujifilm F770EXR
| WB700 | Fujifilm F770EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F770EXR and Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm F770EXR | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F770EXR has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Samsung WB700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F770EXR compared to the WB700.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F770EXR and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F770EXR and WB700.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F770EXR having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F770EXR will result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F770EXR will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 234 gr (0.52 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $480 | $300 |