Clicky

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915

Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
Portability
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs

Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
  • Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR
Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Overview

Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Kodak Z915, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and Z915 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm F800EXR was released 3 years after the Z915 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades versus the Z915 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Kodak Z915

          

          

            
 Fujifilm F800EXR Z915 
RevealedJuly 2012January 2009More modern by 44 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Fujifilm F800EXR

          

          

            
 Z915 Fujifilm F800EXR 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Z915

          

          

            
 Fujifilm F800EXR Z915 
Manually focus  No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither provides Touch friendly screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR provides exterior measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Kodak Z915 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus the Z915.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and Z915 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Z915.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F800EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

            Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm F800EXR
Portrait photography with Kodak Z915
43
 MP count good (16MP)
 comes with face detection focus
 exports RAW files
 focusing manually not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
19
 no manual focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Street photography information
Kodak Z915 Street photography information
68
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competition (232g)
 no moving screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
54
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm F800EXR as a Sports photography camera
 Kodak Z915 as a Sports photography camera
52
 great zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
 no phase detect auto focus
24
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Travel photography advice
Kodak Z915 Travel photography advice
68
 lighter than competition (232g)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 quite wide (25mm)
 great zoom (500mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
54
 has built in flash
 very long reach (350mm)
 missing Time Lapse recording
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
 Fujifilm F800EXR as a Landscape photography camera
 Kodak Z915 as a Landscape photography camera
49
 quite wide (25mm)
 good sized screen (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16MP)
 exports RAW files
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
 missing Time Lapse mode
26
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no manual focus
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.5 inch)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 missing Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F800EXR
Vlogging with Kodak Z915
34
 quite wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than competition (232g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 missing external mic socket
24
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
 missing external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        

          

            
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z915 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Z915
 Fujifilm FinePix F800EXRKodak EasyShare Z915
General Information
Company FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR Kodak EasyShare Z915
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-07-25 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 35-350mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing range 5cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1250 secs
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 194 grams (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 41 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 19.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.9 not tested
DXO Low light rating 143 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $330 $200