Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched July 2012
- Older Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Later Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was introduced 11 months later than the Easyshare M5370 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades against the Easyshare M5370 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
Fujifilm F800EXR | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
Easyshare M5370 | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370
Fujifilm F800EXR | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F800EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the Easyshare M5370.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and Easyshare M5370 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Easyshare M5370.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F800EXR contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The fresher Fujifilm F800EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-07-25 | 2011-09-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $160 |