Clicky

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
  • Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm F800EXR was released 17 months prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm F800EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up vs the Astro Zoom AZ651 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 Fujifilm F800EXR Astro Zoom AZ651 

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm F800EXR

 Astro Zoom AZ651 Fujifilm F800EXR 
RevealedJanuary 2014July 2012More recent by 17 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 Fujifilm F800EXR Astro Zoom AZ651 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has proportions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 90 and 65 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F800EXR will be behind in sensor technology.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Portrait photography factors
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography factors
44
resolution is good (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2")
54
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Street photography features
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography features
68
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (232g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2")
59
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (567 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Sports photography details
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography details
53
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2")
lack of phase detect AF
51
long zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Travel photography factors
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography factors
69
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
60
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (567 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F800EXR
Landscape photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
50
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
54
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (21 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Vlogging camera
34
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone port
60
reasonably wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of mic support
heavier than others in class (567g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Fujifilm FinePix F800EXRKodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-07-25 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 21 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing range 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 11.0fps 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 567 grams (1.25 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 41 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 19.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.9 not tested
DXO Low light rating 143 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $330 $419