Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm F800EXR was released 17 months prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm F800EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up vs the Astro Zoom AZ651 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm F800EXR | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
Astro Zoom AZ651 | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | July 2012 | More recent by 17 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm F800EXR | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has proportions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 90 and 65 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F800EXR will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-07-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 21 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $330 | $419 |