Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was announced 2 years after the SP-800 UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up against the SP-800 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F800EXR | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm F800EXR
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F800EXR | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F800EXR features physical measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus the SP-800 UZ.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F800EXR and SP-800 UZ.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm F800EXR will result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F800EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 12s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $330 | $270 |