Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44


95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Later Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and 6020 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was brought out 2 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up vs the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus 6020
Fujifilm F800EXR | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
6020 | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus 6020
Fujifilm F800EXR | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F800EXR provides external measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR against the 6020.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F800EXR and 6020.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm F800EXR will render extra detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F800EXR provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 122g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $330 | $279 |