Clicky

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Replaced the Fujifilm F770EXR
  • Successor is Fujifilm F900EXR
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and TG-320 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F800EXR was unveiled 7 months after the TG-320 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm F800EXR scores vs the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F800EXR TG-320 
AnnouncedJuly 2012January 2012More modern by 7 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm F800EXR

		

		

			
 TG-320 Fujifilm F800EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F800EXR TG-320 
Manually focus  Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Missing Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR has external measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus the TG-320.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F800EXR and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F800EXR and TG-320.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will give more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F800EXR will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography information
44
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 provides face detection autofocus
 delivers RAW files
 focusing manually not possible
 no external flash support
 very small sensor (1/2")
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 offers face detect focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not available
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Street photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
68
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than competitors in class (232g)
 no moving screen
 very small sensor (1/2")
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competition (155g)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Sports photography info
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography info
53
 incredible zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking autofocus
 very small sensor (1/2")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 environment proof
 max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery life (150 per charge)
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
69
 lighter than competitors in class (232g)
 good MP (16MP)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (25mm)
 very long zoom (500mm)
 no Time Lapse function
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 environment proof
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 not so great battery life (150 shots)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
50
 decently wide (25mm)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (16MP)
 delivers RAW files
 focusing manually not possible
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 very small sensor (1/2")
 no Time Lapse function
39
 quite wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 environment proof
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 small screen (2.7")
 manual mode not available
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 not so great battery life (150 shots)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Vlogging info
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging info
34
 decently wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detection autofocus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competitors in class (232 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 no external mic support
32
 quite wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detect focusing
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 doesn't have mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	

		

			
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F800EXROlympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2012-07-25 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR TruePic III+
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 11.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 155 grams (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 41 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 19.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.9 not tested
DXO Low light rating 143 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots 150 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $330 $0