Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F800EXR was announced 6 months later than the TG-820 iHS and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades against the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
Fujifilm F800EXR | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm F800EXR
TG-820 iHS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 460k | Crisper screen (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS
Fujifilm F800EXR | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR offers physical dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the TG-820 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The visual below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F800EXR using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 220 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $330 | $500 |