Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced July 2012
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was introduced 11 months later than the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades versus the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F800EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm F800EXR
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F800EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR offers exterior dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus the GR Digital IV.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and GR Digital IV is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and GR Digital IV.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Fujifilm F800EXR will produce greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F800EXR is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 390 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $599 |