Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung SL202, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and SL202 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was revealed 3 years after the SL202 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm F800EXR scores versus the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung SL202
Fujifilm F800EXR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
SL202 | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung SL202
Fujifilm F800EXR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F800EXR features external measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the SL202.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F800EXR and SL202.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will resolve greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F800EXR is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $330 | $140 |