Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Older Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Newer Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung WB700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and WB700 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm F800EXR was introduced 20 months after the WB700 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm F800EXR scores vs the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm F800EXR | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2012 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
| WB700 | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung WB700
| Fujifilm F800EXR | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F800EXR comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the WB700.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB700.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will show greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F800EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-07-25 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 41 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $330 | $300 |