Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced July 2012
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F800EXR was brought out 5 months prior to the WB800F so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up vs the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F800EXR | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm F800EXR
| WB800F | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F800EXR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2012 | January 2013 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR has got outside measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR and the WB800F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB800F.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 41 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $330 | $300 |