Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Announced January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was launched 11 months prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up against the Astro Zoom AZ651 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm F900EXR | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
Astro Zoom AZ651 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm F900EXR | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR features external dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has proportions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 90 and 65 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Astro Zoom AZ651.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 21MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 567 grams (1.25 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $380 | $419 |