Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Nikon S9100
- Replacement is Nikon S9500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm F900EXR and Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and S9300 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F900EXR was launched 7 months later than the S9300 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the S9300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9300. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Nikon S9300
| Fujifilm F900EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| S9300 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Nikon S9300
| Fujifilm F900EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers outside measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9300 has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR and Nikon S9300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the S9300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and S9300 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and S9300.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography info
Nikon S9300 Portrait photography info
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2")
decent MP (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Street photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (215g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Nikon S9300
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
small sensor size (1/2")
bad battery life (260 shots)
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery life (200 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Travel photography highlights
lighter than others in class (232g)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
bad battery life (260 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others (215g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery life (200 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Landscape photography highlights
really wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2")
bad battery life (260 shots)
no Timelapse function
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low battery life (200 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging features
Nikon S9300 Vlogging features
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (232g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone jack
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (215 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-07-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 6.9 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 215 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | 200 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $380 | $249 |