Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus FE-4000 front
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Also Known as X-925
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus FE-4000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and FE-4000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F900EXR was revealed 3 years later than the FE-4000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the FE-4000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus FE-4000

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR FE-4000 
LaunchedJanuary 2013July 2009More recent by 43 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

		

		

			
 FE-4000 Fujifilm F900EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus FE-4000

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR FE-4000 
Manual focus  No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR features external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus FE-4000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the FE-4000.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and FE-4000 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and FE-4000.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will offer extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F900EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography info
Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography info
44
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 supports RAW formats
 no manual focus
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
20
 lack of manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Street photography camera
 Olympus FE-4000 as a Street photography camera
68
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW formats
 lighter than average in class (232 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
55
 lighter than competitors (136g)
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography highlights
55
 amazing zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 supports phase detect autofocus
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
 terrible battery pack (260 shots)
17
 no shutter priority
 lack of image stabilization
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Travel photography with Olympus FE-4000
66
 lighter than average in class (232 grams)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 very long reach (500mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 terrible battery pack (260 per charge)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
61
 lighter than competitors (136 grams)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (26mm)
 does not have Timelapse function
 low megapixels (12MP)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography advice
47
 really wide (25mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 supports RAW formats
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2")
 terrible battery pack (260 CIPA)
 no Time Lapse recording
27
 quite wide (26mm)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
 tiny screen (2.7 inches)
 manual exposure not possible
 lack of image stabilization
 low megapixels (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging information
Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging information
34
 really wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than average in class (232 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 no external mic socket
28
 quite wide (26mm)
 lighter than competitors (136 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
 display is not selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
 does not have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus FE-4000
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus FE-4000
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus FE-4000
Also referred to as - X-925
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-30 2009-07-22
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR II TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.6-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 11.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lb) 136 grams (0.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $380 $130