Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus SH-2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SH-1 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was revealed 14 months earlier than the SH-1 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the SH-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SH-1
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| SH-1 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SH-1
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got exterior dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the SH-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography info
Olympus SH-1 Portrait photography info
decent MP (16MP)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2")
megapixel count good (16MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography factors
Olympus SH-1 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
boasts touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography info
Olympus SH-1 Sports photography info
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
very small sensor size (1/2")
low battery (260 per charge)
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
good battery power (380 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SH-1 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery (260 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
boasts touch to focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SH-1 as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
saves RAW files
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2")
low battery (260 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
fairly wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
good battery power (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging information
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging information
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (232g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone jack
fairly wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR II | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 380 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $380 | $349 |