Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
![Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR/Fujifilm-F900EXR-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SH-1/Olympus-SH-1-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus SH-2
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SH-1 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F900EXR was revealed 14 months earlier than the SH-1 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the SH-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SH-1
Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
SH-1 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SH-1
Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got exterior dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the SH-1.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR II | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | 380 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $380 | $349 |