Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Announced March 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus SH-1
  • Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

Here is a in depth comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SH-2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 3 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the SH-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SH-2

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR SH-2 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

		

		

			
 SH-2 Fujifilm F900EXR 
AnnouncedMarch 2015January 2013Fresher by 25 months
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SH-2

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR SH-2 
Focus manually  No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the SH-2.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-2 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-2.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF easier. The older Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
	
			Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography features
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography features
44
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 supports face detection autofocus
 delivers RAW files
 no manual focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is tiny (1/2")
44
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 offers face detect autofocus
 delivers RAW files
 no manual focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography factors
Olympus SH-2 Street photography factors
68
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than competition in class (232g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/2")
70
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 provides touch to focus
 lighter than others (271 grams)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography info
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography info
55
 great zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 supports tracking autofocus
 has phase detect autofocus
 sensor size is tiny (1/2")
 bad battery life (260 shots)
51
 long zoom range (25-600mm  24.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 good battery life (380 CIPA)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography details
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography details
66
 lighter than competition in class (232g)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (25mm)
 great zoom (500mm)
 no Time Lapse function
 bad battery life (260 per charge)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
74
 good battery life (380 shots)
 lighter than others (271g)
 provides touch to focus
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 very long zoom (600mm)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-2
47
 quite wide (25mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 delivers RAW files
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2")
 bad battery life (260 per charge)
 no Time Lapse function
55
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 delivers RAW files
 good battery life (380 shots)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging details
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging details
34
 quite wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detection autofocus
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition in class (232g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 no external mic jack
35
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 built-in touchscreen
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detect autofocus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than others (271g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SH-2
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus Stylus SH-2
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-30 2015-03-11
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR II TruePic VII
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 11.0 frames/s 11.5 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 232g (0.51 lb) 271g (0.60 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photographs 380 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $380 $399