Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SH-3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 4 years earlier than the SH-3 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores against the SH-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SH-3
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| SH-3 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 36 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SH-3
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the SH-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-3 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SH-3.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-3
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2")
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography info
Olympus SH-3 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (232g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch to focus
lighter than competition (271g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography highlights
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
supports phase detect autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2")
not so great battery pack (260 CIPA)
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography info
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography info
lighter than competition in class (232g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (260 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition (271 grams)
provides touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography advice
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
supports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2")
not so great battery pack (260 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (380 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
rather wide (25mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than competition (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR II | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 380 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $579 |