Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6020
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and 6020 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released 3 years later than the 6020 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus 6020

 Fujifilm F900EXR 6020 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013February 2010More recent by 37 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 6020 Fujifilm F900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 6020

 Fujifilm F900EXR 6020 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR has outside measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the 6020.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and 6020.

To sum up, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography factors
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography factors
43
MP count good (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2")
27
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography features
Olympus 6020 Street photography features
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (232 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2")
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (122g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Sports photography camera
55
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
sensor size is small (1/2")
not so great battery (260 shots)
42
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus 6020 Travel photography factors
66
lighter than others (232 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
not so great battery (260 CIPA)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competition in class (122g)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Landscape photography camera
47
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
saves RAW formats
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2")
not so great battery (260 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
environment sealing
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Olympus 6020
34
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (232 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (122g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 6020
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Alternative name - mju Tough 6020
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2013-01-30 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR II TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 13MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 1/4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 11.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 gr (0.51 pounds) 122 gr (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $380 $279