Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Revealed January 2013
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 8010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus 8010, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and 8010 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 3 years later than the 8010 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the 8010 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus 8010

 Fujifilm F900EXR 8010 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2010Fresher by 37 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 8010 Fujifilm F900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 8010

 Fujifilm F900EXR 8010 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys outside measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus 8010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the 8010.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and 8010 is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and 8010.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus 8010
43
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
27
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Street photography with Olympus 8010
68
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (232 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than average (245g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography advice
Olympus 8010 Sports photography advice
55
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
has phase detect AF
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
not so great battery life (260 per charge)
42
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Travel photography with Olympus 8010
66
lighter than competition (232 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery life (260 per charge)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
63
environment sealing
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (245 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus 8010
47
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
delivers RAW files
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
not so great battery life (260 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
39
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 8010 as a Vlogging camera
34
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (232 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
no external microphone port
27
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
heavier than average (245 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 8010
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus Stylus Tough 8010
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Alternative name - mju Tough 8010
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2013-01-30 2010-02-02
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR II TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1/4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 11.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $380 $600