Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 13 months later than the TG-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-320 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2012More recent by 13 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

		

		

			
 TG-320 Fujifilm F900EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-320 
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch display  Lacking Touch display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR has external dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the TG-320.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The graphic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-320.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F900EXR will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
	
			Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
44
 good  resolution (16MP)
 offers face detect autofocus
 exports RAW files
 manual focus not available
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
34
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 includes face detection autofocus
 no manual focus
 manual exposure not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography details
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
68
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competition (232g)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than average in class (155 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
55
 incredible zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16MP)
 offers tracking focus
 supports phase detect autofocus
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
 bad battery power (260 CIPA)
41
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 max fps low (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 low battery pack (150 shots)
 no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
66
 lighter than competition (232g)
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 decently wide (25mm)
 long zoom (500mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 bad battery power (260 shots)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than average in class (155 grams)
 environment proof
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 low battery pack (150 shots)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
47
 decently wide (25mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 exports RAW files
 manual focus not available
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
 bad battery power (260 per charge)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
39
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 environment proof
 no manual focus
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7")
 manual exposure not available
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 low battery pack (150 per charge)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
34
 decently wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detect autofocus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition (232g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have mic jack
32
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection autofocus
 lighter than average in class (155g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus TG-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2013-01-30 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR II TruePic III+
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 11.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 232g (0.51 pounds) 155g (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photos 150 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $380 $0