Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F900EXR was revealed very close to the TG-830 iHS so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the TG-830 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| TG-830 iHS | Fujifilm F900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got outer measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-830 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR uses the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh less difficult.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Portrait photography features
MP count good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2")
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (232g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Sports photography camera
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
small sensor (1/2")
bad battery life (260 per charge)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors (232g)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (260 shots)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
weather proofing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Landscape photography info
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2")
bad battery life (260 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
relatively wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (232g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no mic socket
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $0 |