Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Announced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was revealed 9 months after the TG-1 iHS which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up against the TG-1 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 9 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS
Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR features physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the TG-1 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will result in extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR II | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 350 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $380 | $399 |