Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus VR-340, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and VR-340 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 13 months later than the VR-340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the VR-340 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm F900EXR | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| VR-340 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm F900EXR | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR has exterior measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the VR-340.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and VR-340.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR includes the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography advice
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2")
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography details
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography details
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
has phase detect auto focus
very small sensor size (1/2")
bad battery life (260 shots)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography factors
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (260 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2")
bad battery life (260 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging features
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging features
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (125 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $380 | $130 |