Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature totally different sensor size.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 2 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus XZ-1
Fujifilm F900EXR | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
XZ-1 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus XZ-1
Fujifilm F900EXR | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR has outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the XZ-1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and XZ-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and XZ-1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Fujifilm F900EXR will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR II | TruePic V |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 320 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $567 |