Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52820/52820934f022876444ce4a7f714bc8a8f3b522b2" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and CX4 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 2 years after the CX4 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the CX4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm F900EXR | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
CX4 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm F900EXR | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR has outer measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the CX4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07b82/07b824090fc1ee0983be4950f4be9238b53a8aa0" alt="Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d2e1/6d2e13ef3f75c70349eb41ec95221b50416c8868" alt="Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The picture here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and CX4.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will show more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609c7/609c7ec450cd52fe51bb1fcde6038106bebad48a" alt="Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdaa4/fdaa4a55f685fcf74b9044046b3f239a52d38cf9" alt="Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh CX4 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $211 |