Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 17 months after the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades versus the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F900EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm F900EXR
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm F900EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the GR Digital IV.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and GR Digital IV is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and GR Digital IV.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Fujifilm F900EXR will give more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F900EXR should have an edge in sensor technology.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | 390 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $380 | $599 |