Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WG-80 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 10 years prior to the WG-80 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades against the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| WG-80 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | January 2013 | More modern by 113 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the WG-80.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WG-80 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $300 |