Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 2 months later than the EX2F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the EX2F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung EX2F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| EX2F | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung EX2F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | December 2012 | Similar generation |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR has external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the EX2F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and EX2F.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will offer you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $380 | $478 |