Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
90 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F900EXR was unveiled 6 months after the Galaxy Camera 3G which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the Galaxy Camera 3G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| Fujifilm F900EXR | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| Galaxy Camera 3G | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| Fujifilm F900EXR | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Galaxy Camera 3G is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Galaxy Camera 3G.
Clearly, both cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR contains the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Portrait photography camera
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
saves RAW files
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2")
megapixel count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competitors (232 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (305 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
very small sensor size (1/2")
terrible battery (260 shots)
amazing zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography highlights
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Travel photography highlights
lighter than competitors (232g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
terrible battery (260 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average in class (305 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fairly wide (23mm)
very long reach (481mm)
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography highlights
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Landscape photography highlights
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
saves RAW files
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2")
terrible battery (260 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
fairly wide (23mm)
very good max aperture (f)
big screen (4.8")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging features
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Vlogging features
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (232g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
fairly wide (23mm)
very good max aperture (f)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (305g)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR II | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $606 |