Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F900EXR was launched 6 months later than the Galaxy Camera 4G and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 4G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| Fujifilm F900EXR | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| Galaxy Camera 4G | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| Fujifilm F900EXR | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Galaxy Camera 4G is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR includes the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF simpler.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Portrait photography info
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (232 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (305 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
terrible battery pack (260 CIPA)
amazing zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (232g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (260 CIPA)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (305 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
quite wide (23mm)
very long reach (481mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Landscape photography advice
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports RAW files
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2")
terrible battery pack (260 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
quite wide (23mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
big screen (4.8 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging features
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Vlogging features
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (232 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
quite wide (23mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (305 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR II | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $550 |